Filing A Wrongful Death Lawsuit
When someone dies because of medical mistakes or a defective product, their family can sometimes sue for money through a wrongful death lawsuit. In this kind of lawsuit, people can ask for money to pay for the person’s hospital and medical bills before they died, the pain and suffering the person went through, and other expenses.
Family members who lost a loved one through medical malpractice or a defective product can seek financial compensation by filing a wrongful death lawsuit. In these cases, plaintiffs can seek damages for hospitalization and treatment costs before the deceased’s death, pain, and suffering, and funeral and burial expenses.
Qualifying family members include the surviving spouse, children, grandchildren, parents, grandparents, siblings, etc. If the decedent did not previously designate an individual to serve as the personal representative of their estate, the court would appoint someone to manage the estate and sue on behalf of the family.
If you or a loved one has suffered serious complications after undergoing hernia repair surgery with a mesh implant, you may be eligible to file a mesh injury lawsuit. These lawsuits are currently being filed against several mesh manufacturers, including Atrium, Bard, and Ethicon.
The Fda Has Repeatedly Warned Consumers Of The Risks Of Transvaginal Mesh In 2013 The Agency Ordered Manufacturers Of The Devices To Stop Making And Selling Them
It is now clear that these devices can cause serious internal injuries, and bladder mesh lawsuits are a viable way to recover compensation for those injuries. Furthermore, lawsuits are filed by women who have been injured by the product, as well as by those who have suffered complications after undergoing the surgery.
Despite the risks associated with the mesh, there are ways to avoid them. A bladder mesh sling lawsuit can be filed to get compensation for the pain and suffering caused by the device. If the device causes you severe internal injuries, you may be able to file a suit to hold the manufacturer accountable for their negligence. You can file a lawsuit against the manufacturer of the product if you were the recipient of the device. If you have suffered a severe injury as a result of the defective mesh, you may be entitled to financial compensation for your injuries.
How Do I Know If I Have A Tvm Lawsuit Case
Pelvic Mesh Lawsuits
These surgical procedures frequently use surgical mesh, which can be biologic or synthetic. Biologic mesh is usually made out of human cadaver, porcine or bovine tissue. Biologic meshes are not encompassed within the large, nationwide litigations and settlements. Synthetic mesh is usually made out of manmade fibers , and can be non-absorbable or absorbable. Non-absorbable meshes are not encompassed within the large, nationwide litigations and settlements. The surgical meshes that are encompassed within the large, nationwide litigations and pelvic mesh settlements are synthetic, non-absorbable meshes.
The surgical meshes that are encompassed within the large, nationwide litigations and vaginal mesh settlements are made bymanufacturersincluding: American Medical Systems, Boston Scientific, Coloplast, C.R. Bard, and Johnson & Johnson/Ethicon.
The types of injuries alleged in these large, nationwide TVM lawsuits and settlements include:
Don’t Miss: Is Epsom Salt Good For Bladder Infections
The Company Is Also Settling A Large Number Of Cases
A recent settlement with Medtronic International, a Spanish medical device maker with headquarters in Coral Gables, Florida, has settled an undisclosed amount of pelvic floor mesh lawsuits. The company is a major defendant in the case because of its failure to adequately research the risks of these devices and failure to warn patients of their complications. Hundreds of thousands of women have filed bladder mesh lawsuits against Medtronic and other companies that make these products.
Neomedic International, a Spanish medical device maker with headquarters in Coral Gables, Florida, has faced 130 bladder mesh lawsuits as of February 2019.
The company has settled an undisclosed amount of the cases, but it reserves the right to walk away if ninety percent of claimants did not opt-in. In addition, it has opted to stop manufacturing transvaginal meshes and has agreed to pay $3 billion to settle bladder-mess lawsuits.
Ethicon Is Slow To Offer Settlements
Of all the mesh manufacturers, J& Js Ethicon has been the slowest to offer settlements. The company also faces the highest number of federal lawsuits. Despite multiple trial losses, Johnson & Johnson has refused to agree to a large settlement.
It settled four lawsuits for an undisclosed amount in January 2015. One month later, it settled 111 lawsuits involving OBTape, a bladder sling that was marketed by Mentor Corporation. The product was discontinued in 2006, and Johnson & Johnson bought Mentor in 2009. The OBTape lawsuits were also settled for undisclosed amounts.
The company has been quietly settling groups of cases handled by plaintiffs firms for undisclosed amounts. For example, on June 11, 2019, the Johnson Law Group entered into an agreement with Ethicon, according to Pretrial Order #340.
As of June 19, 2019, about 2,791 cases remained in the MDL.
In addition to personal injury settlements, J& J has had to pay $9.9 million to Washington state for failure to include serious risks in the instructions and marketing materials for surgical mesh devices, according to the Washington State Office of the Attorney General.
Recommended Reading: Nivolumab Bladder Cancer Fda Approval
The Lawsuit Against J& J/ethicon Over The Tvt
The jury found that the TVT-O mesh sling was defective and that the manufacturer failed to warn of potential side effects. In a separate case involving Linda Batiste, a jury awarded $73 million to the woman who sued for her injuries after the device was implanted in April 2013.
The number of bladder sling lawsuits is growing as thousands of women have been injured by these medical devices. Thousands of women have filed claims against the companies and have received settlements worth millions of dollars. A recent verdict in a West Virginia MDL awarded $3.25 million to a woman who was implanted with the Gynecare TVT-O mesh sling in April 2013. The verdict was later reduced to $35 million after the jury decided to award the woman damages.
The amount of bladder sling lawsuit settlements vary widely.
The amount varies between cases, but the average amount of money a woman receives is $3,500. This is not the highest settlement, but it is more than enough to compensate patients. The FDA has a list of all recalled products. The AMS transvaginal mesh is the largest mass tort case in U.S. history.
How A Transvaginal Mesh Defect Lawyer Can Help
When you come to Crumley Roberts, you will find that our attorneys and support staff take your concerns to heart. We realize you are going through an extremely difficult time in your life and want to help you through to a brighter future.
Our lawyers can handle transvaginal mesh lawsuits involving such side effects as:
Recommended Reading: Doterra Oils For Bladder Infection
Since The First Lawsuit Was Filed More Than One Million Women Have Received Their Implants
After the trial, the companies have made several settlement offers. A few of the largest settlements have been awarded to patients who suffered adverse effects. Ethicon recently settled a bladder mesh lawsuit involving Pamela Wicker. She claims that her Prolift device eroded inside her body and required multiple surgeries. The courts decision was highly anticipated, as the cost of litigation could be much higher than expected. A law professor said that this case was a good example of how the costs of pursuing a mesh lawsuit could be more expensive than expected.
Obytrx Surgical Mesh $345 Million
In 2015, a jury found that the company had acted in absolute negligence by using a defective product with adverse implications. The product in question was Obytrx mesh, which the couple that sued for damages claimed was found to be biologically incompatible with human tissue. Plaintiffs also claimed the touted benefits and safety were later found to be misleading to the public.
Read Also: What Is Overactive Bladder Syndrome
Hundreds Of Bladder Sling Lawsuits
There have been hundreds of bladder sling lawsuits filed since 2008 due to the defects of Mentors ObTape. These bladder sling lawsuits have been combined into a MDL or Multi-District Litigation in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia. This MDL is being presided over by Judge Clay D. Land and allows the pre-trial proceedings to be consolidated into one. It is slowly moving forward, and after the first trial got underway, Johnson and Johnson began settling with plaintiffs.
Around 35,000 women in the US have had a sling implant using ObTape, however- only a fraction of these have filed bladder sling lawsuits as a result.
Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Settlement Compensation Payouts
The MDL judge in the Bard hernia mesh class action issued an order confirming the pre-trial and trial schedule for the upcoming 3rd bellwether test trial in the case of Stinson v. C.R. Bard, et al.
The trial will commence on February 21, 2023. Each side will be allowed a total of 35 hours of trial time, which should give us a trial of about 3 weeks. Final Daubert motions are due by October 7, 2022. After a defense verdict, a verdict, and a whopping verdict, Stinson is a big deal… unless it settles and the rest of the mesh lawsuits reach a settlement before February.
Evidence came into focus in the recent hernia mesh trial in Rhode Island state court that underscored that C.R. Bard may have knowingly used a type of plastic in its hernia mesh products that its supplier considered to be unfit for that purpose.
The evidence presented at trial indicates that C.R. Bard used a plastic resin called Pro-fax 5623 in its hernia mesh products despite warnings from the plastic supplier expressly prohibiting it from being used for that purpose.
Bard executives insisted on using the resin despite these warnings because it was the cheapest and strongest material available. This is a major new allegation.
A strong new angle with jury appeal and a new $4.8 million verdict in the trial has led us to revise our projected hernia mesh settlement amounts below.
Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Settlement AmountsSummary of Hernia Mesh Defects
You May Like: Chemo In Bladder Side Effects
Another Recent Multistate Pelvic Mesh Lawsuit Which Has Topped Seven Billion Dollars Has Settled In A Multistate Lawsuit
Earlier this year, a $117 million settlement was reached between Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, a subsidiary of Johnson & Joh. During this time, the two companies were involved in more than 11,500 pelvic mesh lawsuits, and the average settlement was $40 million.
Currently, the average pelvic mesh lawsuit settlement is around $40,000, and the plaintiff can expect half of that amount in the settlement. In some cases, the plaintiffs may get as much as half of the award, but in others, the settlement may only be one-third of the total settlement. Regardless of the size of the settlement, the women who were affected by the mesh are suing Boston Scientific, and many of these companies have agreed to settle their claims.
In addition to the settlements, women are also suing manufacturers of pelvic mesh devices.
The companies were sued by patients in the past for causing uterine prolapse, but they have been unable to stop the leaking. As a result, the plaintiffs attorneys are calculating the damages from the cases in federal and state courts. The plaintiffs lawyers believe that the average settlement amount for a pelvic mesh lawsuit is $11.7 billion.
History Of Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuits
Following is a bit of the history of the transvaginal mesh lawsuits. This list includes cases that have either already gone through trial or been settled out of court.
- 2012: C.R. Bard demanded by jury verdict to pay $5.5 million to a couple in California
- 2013: Ethicon/Johnson and Johnson by jury verdict demanded to pay $3.35 million to a woman in New Jersey
- 2013: C.R. Bard demanded via jury verdict to pay $2 million to a woman in West Virginia
- 2013: Bloomberg News announced that some of these manufacturers were in discussions to reach a settlement out of court for up to $30 thousand per claim. However, this agreement has not been officially announced.
- 2014: An agreement was made by American Medical Systems to settle around 20,000 cases for $830 million- however, if more cases are added, that total will increase.
- 2014: An agreement has been made by Coloplast to settle around 400 lawsuits for about $16 million- but the parties have been sworn to secrecy.
Don’t Miss: Where Is A Man’s Bladder Located
What Are The Problems With Recalled Hernia Mesh Products
Mesh device manufacturers market their products as a safe option for repairing a hernia. The device is designed to last for years, but unfortunately, this is not always the case. The most common mesh type is made from a plastic knitted material that can degrade over time and cause significant health problems.
The main way to tell if the mesh device has failed is to experience severe abdomen pain or other symptoms years after surgery.
If there is a recall on your hernia mesh medical device, it is important to seek medical attention and contact a lawyer as soon as possible.
If you are experiencing any of the following symptoms, you may have a torn hernia mesh:
- Recurring hernias
If you are experiencing any of these symptoms, contact your doctor or file a lawsuit against your hernia mesh implant manufacturer.
What Financial Payouts Have Resulted From Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
Many patients who have suffered complications after undergoing hernia surgeries using repair devices have filed hernia mesh claims against the manufacturers.
Patients usually ask their hernia mesh attorneys how much financial compensation they can expect from a successful lawsuit. Typical resolutions involve payouts in mesh lawsuit settlements and jury awards.
Many hernia mesh lawsuits may eventually be resolved in a hernia mesh lawsuit settlement, especially after plaintiffs in similar cases have obtained a significant jury verdict award. Hernia mesh litigation associated with nearly every FDA medical device recall is initially resolved through “bellwether” trials.
Also Check: Causes Of Repeated Bladder Infections
Pinnacle Mesh Group Settlement $119 Million
In 2015, women who had Pinnacle pelvic mesh implantations sued C.R Bard. These women filed 2,970 individual lawsuits claiming the mesh implant devices meant to treat pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence were defective, and the company hid known risks of using synthetic mesh in the human body.
Similar to hernia mesh allegations, the pelvic mesh surgeries resulted in adverse side effects and complications such as infection, bleeding, and pain, many times necessitating the need for corrective surgeries to remove the mesh. Instead of taking these cases to trial, C.R Bard agreed to settle these claims and paid $119 million to these women.
Pelvic Mesh Manufacturers Blame Surgical Techniques
Pelvic mesh manufacturers have attempted to lay the blame squarely on surgeons, claiming faulty surgical techniques were to blame for the high number of poor outcomes, however it is doubtful that poor surgical techniques could be to blame when pelvic mesh problems occurred more than a month after the surgery. Plaintiffs with pelvic mesh claims asserted the manufacturers of the pelvic mesh deliberately misled the FDA and the medical community regarding the safety and effectiveness of pelvic mesh products. By 2012, the FDA had reclassified pelvic mesh as a high-risk device, with many women saying that not only had their original issues not been relieved, but that they also suffered many more adverse symptoms following the surgery.
Recommended Reading: Bladder Cancer Treatment With Tuberculosis Bacteria
How Much Is A Transvaginal Mesh Case Worth
The estimated settlement or verdict for a Transvaginal Mesh implant lawsuit is dependent on several factors of varying significance including the severity of the injury, requirement for revision medical procedures, and life care costs. Some of the most significant factors in determining an estimated settlement amount are presented below.
1. The Severity of the Injury: The magnitude of the injury suffered is a major factor contributing to the value of a transvaginal mesh lawsuit. Some of the most common medical complications include erosion of the vaginal mesh through the vaginal mucosa, severe pain and discomfort, sexual dysfunction or inability to perform sexual intercourse without great pain, vaginal Infections and vaginal bleeding, incontinence of the bowls, urinary and bladder control issues, and vaginal Contraction and shrinkage.
3: Lost Wages and Loss of Future Income: Plaintiff in defectively designed and manufactured medical devices are entitled to recovery of lost wages and future loss or reduction of income. In such instances vocational experts will be able to determine the estimated life time reduction resulting from injuries suffered.
- Client suffered from the daily pain of transvaginal mesh defect for the past 300 days and another 365 days for future pain and suffering adding up to a total of 665 days. A jury places a daily monetary value for pain and suffering at $500.000. Thus the value for pain and suffering will be or $332,500.
Coloplast Settles Claims Increases Legal Budget
Coloplast faced the second fewest lawsuits in the West Virginia MDL. The first lawsuit against Coloplast was scheduled to begin in December 2013, but the company announced that it would settle about 400 mesh lawsuits for $16 million in January 2014. The claimants reportedly received about $40,000.
Coloplast increased its legal budget to $448 million in September 2015 after courts ordered the company to move forward on litigation involving 200 cases. Less than 500 cases were pending against Coloplast in 2017.
As of June 19, 2019, only 114 cases remain.
Bard, Boston Scientific and Ethicon had thousands of cases pending against them as of June 2019. Cook Medical had 1 case pending. AMS, now part of Endo, had 182 cases in the MDL after resolving tens of thousands of cases.
Transvaginal mesh manufacturers have lost hundreds of millions of dollars in jury verdicts, and theyve paid about $8 billion to settle tens of thousands of claims. The size of jury verdicts in state courts has been climbing. More verdicts and confidential settlements could be pending.
Only 6,371 cases remained active in the West Virginia MDL as of June 2019.
Board-certified physicians medically review Drugwatch content to ensure its accuracy and quality.
Drugwatch partners with Physicians Review Network Inc. to enlist specialists. PRN is a nationally recognized leader in providing independent medical reviews.
You May Like: Can You Clear Up A Bladder Infection Without Antibiotics